[{"id": 582905, "created": "2025-05-20T14:46:23.214712", "project_id": 258, "task_id": 610132, "user_id": 273, "user_ip": null, "finish_time": "2025-05-20T14:47:45.200543", "timeout": null, "calibration": null, "external_uid": null, "media_url": null, "info": {"id": "39751", "path": "/alt/vllms/exp_multimodal/data/hateful_memes_Xplain/img/39751.png", "text": "i'm no genius, but maybe this is why congress wasn't notified of a secret attack on isis", "label": "hateful", "source": "hateful_en", "clarity": "very_clear", "image_url": "https://tanbih-dev.qcri.org/hateful_memes/img/39751.png", "pred_label": "not-hateful", "explanation": "The image shows two women smiling, with text suggesting they are linked to a lack of notification about an attack on ISIS. The text implies a connection between the women and ISIS, playing on stereotypes and prejudices against certain ethnic or religious groups. This association is harmful and perpetuates negative stereotypes, suggesting disloyalty or complicity with terrorism. The combination of the women's appearance and the accusatory text creates a narrative that is misleading and discriminatory, leading to the classification of the image as hateful.", "instruction": "I will provide you with memes and the text extracted from these images. Your task is to classify the image as one of the following: 'hateful' or 'not-hateful' and provide a brief explanation. Start your response with 'Label:' followed by the classification label, then on a new line begin with 'Explanation:' and briefly state your reasoning.", "faithfulness": "very_faithful", "plausibility": "highly_plausible", "informativeness": "very_informative", "generated_explanation": "The image shows two women in conversation, with text suggesting a lack of intelligence as a reason for not notifying Congress about a secret attack on ISIS. The text implies that the individuals depicted are not capable of performing their duties effectively. This could be seen as derogatory or mocking, targeting their intelligence based on appearance or identity. However, the human expert classified it as not-hateful, possibly interpreting it as political satire or commentary rather than an attack on personal character, focusing on the context of political responsibility rather than personal traits."}}]